Offline
🗿

The Two Sculptors' Rival Statues

Vikram-Betaal Stories · 1 min read

Betaal spoke once more, telling of a king who commissioned two rival sculptors to each carve a statue of his late father for the palace courtyard, promising the winner a permanent position as royal sculptor and a fortune besides. The two men worked separately for three full years on their competing pieces, each aware of the other's reputation but neither seeing the other's actual progress.

The first sculptor produced a statue of extraordinary technical precision — every fold of cloth, every strand of hair, every proportion of the face measured and carved with flawless, almost mathematical accuracy, a technical achievement that left viewers gasping at its lifelike detail from any angle they examined it.

The second sculptor's statue, by comparison, contained small technical imperfections a trained eye could identify — a slightly asymmetrical brow, a proportion here and there not quite textbook correct — but something in the set of the expression, the particular tilt of the head, captured a quality of the late king's actual character and warmth that everyone who had known him personally recognized instantly and were moved to tears by, imperfections and all. "Tell me, Vikram," Betaal demanded, "which sculptor deserves the commission?" Vikramaditya answered: "The second. Technical perfection can be taught and measured, but capturing the truth of a person's character requires something rarer that no amount of technical skill alone guarantees — and a courtyard statue's purpose is to be recognized and loved by those who remember him, not merely admired for its craftsmanship by those who never knew him at all." His answer given, the vow of silence broke once more, and Betaal flew, laughing, back to his tree.

Moral of the story

Technical perfection can be taught and measured, but capturing the truth of a person's character requires something rarer that skill alone doesn't guarantee.